Skip to content
    Back to writing
    August 26, 2026 · 6 min read

    A dead airline's price history cleared at ten million dollars

    TL;DR [show]

    Google won a bankruptcy auction for Spirit Aviation Holdings' internal data at $10 million, outbidding the AI training-data company Mercor at $7.5 million. Judge Sean H. Lane's approval hearing moved from August 19 to September 9 after the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA objected that de-identification will not hold when the sale agreement preserves links across datasets. The union's filing states plainly that it does not seek to prevent the estates from monetizing data assets; it wants the identifiers removed. The piece argues that the contested half of the lot is the cheap half. Alongside 100 million emails and 175,658 employee records sit 7,250,630,887 competitor fare observations licensed from Infare since January 2021, 7,510,221,520 revenue transactions in Navitaire back to May 2008, and 3.5 billion booking-curve observations, which together are not a record of Spirit but a record of the market Spirit priced against. Nobody filed anything about that half. Mercor, which pays out $1.5 to $2 million a day to manufacture expert training data, bid four days of its own payroll for eighteen years of a real operating record and lost. The structural read is that liquidation has become a data channel with a court-supervised process, a fiduciary obliged to maximize value, a buyer pool, and no established price.

    A dead airline's price history cleared at ten million dollars — by Thomas Jankowski, aided by AI
    The contested pile, and the larger one— TJ x AI

    Spirit stopped flying on May 2. The estate has been selling what is left of it since, and the largest remaining asset turned out to be a hard drive.

    Google won it at auction for ten million dollars.

    The inventory is public, and it is worth reading in the order the filings list it, because the order is roughly the inverse of the value. A hundred million emails across eighty thousand accounts. Five hundred million Teams messages. Thirty million lines of source code. Employee records going back to 1986. Finance documents, legal documents, audit and fraud records, the ordinary sediment of a company that existed for a long time and then stopped.

    Then, further down:

    Seven billion, two hundred fifty million, six hundred thirty thousand, eight hundred eighty-seven competitor fare observations, licensed from Infare, running since January 2021. Seven billion, five hundred ten million revenue transactions in Navitaire, and a hundred ninety million passenger name records, going back to May 2008. Three and a half billion booking-curve observations since January 2023. Every refund and voucher since March 2009.

    The objection is about the emails

    The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA filed against the sale, and Judge Sean H. Lane moved the approval hearing from August 19 to September 9 to hear it. The union's argument is technically sharp, which is not always true of privacy objections. Spirit says the records will be de-identified before transfer. AFA points out that the sale agreement preserves the links between datasets, and that de-identification plus preserved joins is a reconstruction problem rather than a solved one. Given eighty thousand mailbox owners and a payroll table, that is not a paranoid reading.

    But the filing also says something the coverage has mostly skipped. AFA states that it "does not seek to disrupt the Debtors' sale process, to unwind the Auction, or to prevent the estates from monetizing data assets." It wants the identifiers stripped. That is the whole ask.

    So the only party that showed up to object conceded the sale and asked for redaction. And nobody, in any filing, said anything at all about the fare archive.

    The fare archive is not a record of Spirit

    This is the part where the inventory ordering stops being an accident.

    A revenue-management archive of that shape is not a record of what one airline charged. The Infare feed is competitor observation: what every other carrier's price was doing, on the routes Spirit cared about, sampled continuously for four and a half years. Not the fares that were published. The fares that werewatched, which is a different and much shorter list of things, because a carrier only pays to observe the prices it is pricing against. The Navitaire side is eighteen years of what actually transacted underneath those prices (a hundred ninety million passenger name records is not a sample, it is the population). The booking curve is the two joined against time, which is the only way to see what a fare was doing as the aircraft filled.

    Put together, that is not Spirit's history. It is a continuous, observation-level record of how the United States domestic air market priced itself, kept by a participant with a reason to keep it accurately, running back to 2008. There are maybe a dozen organisations on earth holding something comparable, and none of them are selling.

    It is worth measuring that against what this information normally costs to get. Ottawa spent this spring legislating the power to compel it, writing a division into a budget bill so the transport minister could require airports, their tenants and their contractors to hand over financial data, capital plans and material contracts, on the reasonable theory thata landlord who cannot see inside its own asset cannot price it. That is the going rate for this class of information: an act of Parliament.

    This one sold for ten million dollars, because its owner died and the estate had to take the best bid in the room.

    The buyer operates the largest flight-search surface in the world. The filings say the data is for product development and AI model training, and they do not mention Google Flights, and I am not going to pretend they do. You do not have to draw that line for it to sit there on the page.

    There is also a prior question that the docket does not appear to answer. Those seven and a quarter billion fare observations were licensed, not generated. Infare was acquired by OAG in 2023 and sells the same product to something like a hundred fifty airlines and online travel agencies, several of which competed with Spirit and one of which now has the accumulated output of that feed heading to a company none of them sold it to. Whether an archive of licensed competitive-fare data is the debtor's to assign is a real question with a real answer. Nobody in the courtroom has asked it, because the party with standing to ask is a vendor, and vendors do not usually turn up to bankruptcy auctions to argue about what their customers were allowed to keep.

    What the underbidder tells you about the price

    Mercor bid seven and a half million and lost.

    Mercor is an AI training-data company. It was valued around ten billion dollars last October and has been in talks at twice that (which tells you the labs are not short of money for this, and are short of the thing itself). Its business is manufacturing the kind of data labs want by paying a network of some thirty thousand doctors, lawyers, analysts and engineers to produce it, at an average around eighty-five dollars an hour, and it pays out somewhere between one and a half and two million dollars a day doing it. Every hour of that is commissioned. Somebody writes a task, somebody qualified does it, somebody checks it.

    Which means the losing bidder offered roughly four days of its own payroll for eighteen years of a real company's operating record. And still lost.

    That is the number worth sitting with. Manufactured expert data is expensive and slow and has to be commissioned one task at a time. A dead company's operating record is complete, internally consistent, already joined, and priced by whoever else happened to be in the room that day. Nobody had to decide what it was worth in the abstract. Two bidders decided, on a Tuesday, and the number came out at ten million.

    Liquidation is a data channel now

    Chapter 11 supplies a court-supervised sale process, a fiduciary obliged to maximize the value of the estate, a buyer pool with more money than the estate has creditors, and an asset class that did not exist as an asset class the last time anybody rewrote the code. What it does not supply is a price. There is no comparable. There is no index. There is a room.

    Every company that fails from here forward leaves one of these behind. Not the brand, which is worth something to a nostalgia buyer, and not the fleet, which goes back to the lessors under agreements written decades ago by people who understood exactly what they were lending. The operating record. The thing that was a cost centre for eighteen years and a footnote in every board deck about IT spend.

    And it will keep being priced this way, by two bidders in a room, until somebody loses badly enough in public to establish what one is worth.

    One more thing, and it is the part the docket makes easy to skip. A hundred million emails across eighty thousand accounts, and employee records reaching back to 1986, are not an asset class. They are the working lives of people who were furloughed by the same estate that is now selling their correspondence, and the crew that filed the objection is asking for the only thing in that lot they could recognise as theirs. They are probably right about the identifiers. The hearing is September 9 and nothing is approved yet. But they can be right about that and still watch the more valuable half go uncontested, because in a courtroom full of creditors, nobody has standing to care about a fare table.

    Spirit's aircraft went back to the lessors. Its price history went to the company that runs the search box.

    —TJ